Denise Schultz
Impact in
- Virology top 2%
- Poxvirus research and outbreaks
-
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
- Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Papers in
-
- Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research 2
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 2
- Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research 1
-
- Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research 3
- Co-authors
- R. Mark L. Buller (2 shared papers)Scott Parker (1 shared paper)Anthony A. Nuara (1 shared paper)Angelo M. De Marzo (5 shared papers)Jessica Hicks (3 shared papers)Tsuyoshi Iwata (4 shared papers)Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian (4 shared papers)David L. Huso (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Journal Of Pathology (2 papers)Future Microbiology (1 paper)Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery (1 paper)Virology (1 paper)The Journal of Urology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Denise Schultz
8 papers receiving 637 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Virology 279
- Cancer Research 131
- Molecular Biology 479
- Epidemiology 213
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 133
Countries citing papers authored by Denise Schultz
This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Schultz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Schultz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Schultz. The network helps show where Denise Schultz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denise Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 240 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 112 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 97 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 93 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 3 |
About Denise Schultz
Denise Schultz is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Virology and Epidemiology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 655 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (3 papers), Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (2 papers), Poxvirus research and outbreaks (2 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (1 paper) and Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (279 citations), Cancer Research (131 citations), Molecular Biology (479 citations), Epidemiology (213 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (133 citations). Denise Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include R. Mark L. Buller, Scott Parker, Anthony A. Nuara, Angelo M. De Marzo, Jessica Hicks, Tsuyoshi Iwata, Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian, David L. Huso, John E. Sagartz and William G. Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal Of Pathology, Future Microbiology, Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery, Virology and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.