Denise Chen
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 0.5%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
-
- Multisensory perception and integration
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Papers in
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 10
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 5
- Co-authors
- Wen Zhou (6 shared papers)Jeannette Haviland-Jones (2 shared papers)Pamela Dalton (1 shared paper)Yi Jiang (2 shared papers)Xiaofeng Wu (1 shared paper)Guo-Jun Xie (1 shared paper)Henry C. Foley (1 shared paper)Mark G. Stevens (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Current Biology (2 papers)Psychological Science (2 papers)Chemical Senses (1 paper)Chemical Communications (1 paper)Cell Biology International (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Denise Chen
16 papers receiving 738 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Sensory Systems 515
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 270
- Cognitive Neuroscience 190
- Social Psychology 175
- Nutrition and Dietetics 125
Countries citing papers authored by Denise Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Chen. The network helps show where Denise Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denise Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 159 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 138 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 136 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 97 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 78 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 16 | Report Olfaction Modulates Visual Perception in Binocular Rivalry | 2010 | 1 |
About Denise Chen
Denise Chen is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 768 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (10 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers), Color perception and design (3 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (1 paper) and Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (515 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (270 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (190 citations), Social Psychology (175 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (125 citations). Denise Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Wen Zhou, Jeannette Haviland-Jones, Pamela Dalton, Yi Jiang, Xiaofeng Wu, Guo-Jun Xie, Henry C. Foley, Mark G. Stevens, Caleb Ho and Malin Hultcrantz. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Psychological Science, Chemical Senses, Chemical Communications and Cell Biology International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.