Denis Fitzpatrick

1.8k citations
57 papers · 1.4k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Denis Fitzpatrick

52 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Denis Fitzpatrick
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Sensory Systems 733
  • Otorhinolaryngology 464
  • Neurology 313
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 627
  • Speech and Hearing 178
Replace Peter Kummer with:
Peter Kummer Germany
Beth A. Prieve United States
M. Patrick Feeney United States
Gijsbert A. van Zanten Netherlands
Joseph Kei Australia
Artur Lorens Poland
M. P. Brocaar Netherlands
Patricia Roush United States
Hasso von Wedel Germany
Hung Thaï-Van France
Denis Fitzpatrick relative to Peter Kummer Germany Peter Kummer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Peter Kummer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denis Fitzpatrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denis Fitzpatrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis Fitzpatrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis Fitzpatrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denis Fitzpatrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis Fitzpatrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis Fitzpatrick. The network helps show where Denis Fitzpatrick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denis Fitzpatrick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denis Fitzpatrick Line = papers co-authored together Denis Fitzpatrick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008101
2 200987
3 200986
4 201679
5 201274
6 201272
7 200663
8 200852
9 200950
10 200345
11 201540
12 201638
13 200736
14
Amplitude/intensity functions of auditory event-related potentials predict responsiveness to bupropion in major depressive disorder.
199531
15 202030
16 202128
17 200328
18 201528
19 201127
20 200826

About Denis Fitzpatrick

Denis Fitzpatrick is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Otorhinolaryngology, Neurology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (22 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (18 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (17 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (9 papers), Noise Effects and Management (5 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (733 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (464 citations), Neurology (313 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (627 citations) and Speech and Hearing (178 citations). Denis Fitzpatrick has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Douglas H. Keefe, John C. Ellison, Michael P. Gorga, Chris A. Sanford, M. Patrick Feeney, Lisa L. Hunter, Kim S. Schairer, Yi-Wen Liu, Shelton E. Hendricks and Shawn S. Goodman. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Ear and Hearing, Hearing Research, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology and Sexual Abuse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact