Deirdre Duke
Impact in
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Papers in
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 7
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 4
- Surgery 10
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction 3
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 2
- Co-authors
- Stephen Eustace (5 shared papers)John F. Quinlan (2 shared papers)Premsri Barton (2 shared papers)Julie A. Margenthaler (1 shared paper)Jill R. Dietz (1 shared paper)Barbara Monsees (1 shared paper)Peter MacMahon (3 shared papers)Darren D. Brennan (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Radiology (3 papers)Clinical Breast Cancer (1 paper)Academic Radiology (1 paper)BMC Cancer (1 paper)The American Journal of Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IrelandUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Deirdre Duke
19 papers receiving 472 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 298
- Cancer Research 118
- Surgery 260
- Pharmacology 81
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 98
Countries citing papers authored by Deirdre Duke
This map shows the geographic impact of Deirdre Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deirdre Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deirdre Duke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deirdre Duke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deirdre Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deirdre Duke. The network helps show where Deirdre Duke may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deirdre Duke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 130 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 73 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 13 | |
| 13 | A CAUSE OF BACK PAIN IN YOUNG PEOPLE | 2006 | 11 |
| 14 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 0 |
About Deirdre Duke
Deirdre Duke is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Cancer Research, Oncology and Pharmacology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (8 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (7 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (2 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (298 citations), Cancer Research (118 citations), Surgery (260 citations), Pharmacology (81 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (98 citations). Deirdre Duke has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Eustace, John F. Quinlan, Premsri Barton, Julie A. Margenthaler, Jill R. Dietz, Barbara Monsees, Peter MacMahon, Darren D. Brennan, Colm Power and Arnold D. Hill. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Radiology, Clinical Breast Cancer, Academic Radiology, BMC Cancer and The American Journal of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.