Debra Morgan

162 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers

Debra Morgan
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.2k
  • Research and Theory 51
  • General Health Professions 1.4k
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 58
  • Health 272
Replace Dorothy Forbes with:
Dorothy Forbes Canada
Carl D’Arcy Canada
Wai Tong Chien Hong Kong
John Keady United Kingdom
Hilde Verbeek Netherlands
Myrra Vernooij‐Dassen Netherlands
Eleanor S. McConnell United States
Linda R. Phillips United States
Siow Ann Chong Singapore
Jaclene A. Zauszniewski United States
Debra Morgan relative to Dorothy Forbes Canada Dorothy Forbes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Dorothy Forbes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Debra Morgan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Morgan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Morgan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Morgan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Morgan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Morgan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Morgan. The network helps show where Debra Morgan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Debra Morgan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Debra Morgan Line = papers co-authored together Debra Morgan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 169 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018183
2 2002158
3 2008141
4 2004135
5 2002126
6 2008122
7 2009120
8 2009112
9 2010110
10 201492
11 201388
12 201283
13 200575
14 201067
15 200464
16 200963
17 200760
18 199958
19 199157
20 200657

About Debra Morgan

Debra Morgan is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Health, having authored 169 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (82 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (43 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (14 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (13 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (7 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.2k citations), Research and Theory (51 citations), General Health Professions (1.4k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (58 citations) and Health (272 citations). Debra Morgan has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Norma J. Stewart, Dorothy Forbes, Carl D’Arcy, Megan E. O’Connell, Julie Kosteniuk, Margaret Crossley, Andrew Kirk, Karen M. Semchuk, Anthea Innes and Judy E. Boychuk Duchscher. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of Applied Gerontology and Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact