Deborah Thien

12 papers receiving 542 citations

Deborah Thien's Hit Papers

After or beyond feeling? A consideration of affect and emotion in geography 2005 · 431 citations
4310+7+14Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Deborah Thien
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Geography, Planning and Development 259
  • Cultural Studies 69
  • Sociology and Political Science 296
  • Urban Studies 36
  • Gender Studies 46
Replace Andrew S. Maclaren with:
Andrew S. Maclaren United Kingdom
Eden Kinkaid United States
Bawaka Country Australia
Elsie Ho New Zealand
Hannah Macpherson United Kingdom
Michelle Bastian United Kingdom
Merrkiyawuy Ganambarr‐Stubbs Australia
Elizabeth Kenworthy Teather Australia
Sarah Mills United Kingdom
David E. Sutton United States
Deborah Thien relative to Andrew S. Maclaren United Kingdom Andrew S. Maclaren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Andrew S. Maclaren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Thien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Thien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Thien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Thien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Thien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Thien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Thien. The network helps show where Deborah Thien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Thien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Thien Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Thien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1
After or beyond feeling? A consideration of affect and emotion in geography
Hit paper breakdown →
2005431
2 201150
3 200838
4 201219
5 200810
6 20088
7 20098
8 20137
9 20096
10
Gender and geography: 20 years on
20043
11 20141
12 20091
13 20070

About Deborah Thien

Deborah Thien is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Anthropology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 582 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rural development and sustainability (5 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (2 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (1 paper), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (1 paper), Urban Planning and Governance (1 paper) and Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (259 citations), Cultural Studies (69 citations), Sociology and Political Science (296 citations), Urban Studies (36 citations) and Gender Studies (46 citations). Deborah Thien has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Laura Ryser, Paul Laris, Greg Halseth, Mary Kim Ngo, Vincent J. Del Casino, Holly Dolan, Neil Hanlon, Sarah de Leeuw, Margot W. Parkes and Kath Browne. Their work appears in journals such as Emotion, space and society, Area, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Research in Higher Education and Human Geography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact