Deborah McPhail

32 papers receiving 622 citations

Peers

Deborah McPhail
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Pharmacy 316
  • Gender Studies 84
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 34
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 96
  • Clinical Psychology 125
Replace Karen Throsby with:
Karen Throsby United Kingdom
Tami M. Videon United States
Yuko Yamamiya Japan
Deana Leahy Australia
Shannon Jetté United States
Margaret L. Stubbs United States
Hemal Shroff India
David Sánchez‐Carracedo Spain
Rheanna N. Ata United States
Kimberly J. McClure Brenchley United States
Deborah McPhail relative to Karen Throsby United Kingdom Karen Throsby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Karen Throsby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah McPhail

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah McPhail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah McPhail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah McPhail more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah McPhail

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah McPhail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah McPhail. The network helps show where Deborah McPhail may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah McPhail, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah McPhail Line = papers co-authored together Deborah McPhail links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201695
2 201679
3 200873
4 201154
5 201647
6 200940
7 201435
8 201932
9 201231
10 201329
11 201321
12 202121
13 201519
14 201415
15 201614
16 20238
17 20178
18 20177
19 20167
20 20135

About Deborah McPhail

Deborah McPhail is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 666 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity and Health Practices (15 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers), Diversity and Impact of Dance (5 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (3 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (316 citations), Gender Studies (84 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (34 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (96 citations) and Clinical Psychology (125 citations). Deborah McPhail has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrea E. Bombak, Brenda L. Beagan, Gwen E. Chapman, Heather Sykes, Jill Allison, Michael Orsini, Kate Cairns, Carla Rice, Elisabeth Harrison and Andrea LaMarre. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Critical Public Health, Fat Studies, Antipode and Drug Information Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact