Deborah McBride

68 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

Deborah McBride
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Applied Psychology 51
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 48
  • General Health Professions 135
  • Demography 46
  • Clinical Psychology 75
Replace Pei‐Lun Hsieh with:
Pei‐Lun Hsieh Taiwan
Vincent Salyers Canada
Catherine Lim United States
Jenni Konttila Finland
Agneta Andersson Sweden
Nancy F. Weller United States
Meriam Caboral‐Stevens United States
Claire Sullivan United States
Holly Walton United Kingdom
Aileen Wyllie Australia
Deborah McBride relative to Pei‐Lun Hsieh Taiwan Pei‐Lun Hsieh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23×
Pei‐Lun Hsieh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah McBride

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah McBride's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah McBride with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah McBride more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah McBride

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah McBride. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah McBride. The network helps show where Deborah McBride may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah McBride, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah McBride Line = papers co-authored together Deborah McBride links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201571
2 200645
3 201136
4 201534
5 201524
6 201720
7 201316
8 202112
9 201811
10 202110
11 20129
12 20128
13 20248
14 20128
15 19898
16
Misuse of social networking may have ethical implications for nurses.
20098
17 20137
18 20147
19 20165
20 20215

About Deborah McBride

Deborah McBride is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 80 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (5 papers), Family Support in Illness (4 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (3 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (51 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (48 citations), General Health Professions (135 citations), Demography (46 citations) and Clinical Psychology (75 citations). Deborah McBride has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and France. Frequent co-authors include Sandra A. LeVasseur, Dongmei Li, Mitchell M. Levy, Eric David Cohen, Joseph Ducette, Gerald J. Stahler, Ken Paterson, Ian D. Watson, Philip M.J. Reckers and Govind S. Iyer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Nursing, Postgraduate Medical Journal, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact