Deborah Hutton

527 citations
10 papers · 381 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah Hutton

9 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers

Deborah Hutton
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 250
  • Social Psychology 138
  • Clinical Psychology 122
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 110
  • Pharmacy 17
Replace Fang Fuxi with:
Fang Fuxi China
Rosa Ana Clemente Spain
Carolyn A. Schult United States
Juan Adrián Spain
Lindsay Parkin United Kingdom
John H. Flavell United States
Frans X. Plooij Netherlands
Joann P. Benigno United States
Peg Hull Smith United States
Zhen Wu China
Deborah Hutton relative to Fang Fuxi China Fang Fuxi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Fang Fuxi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Hutton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Hutton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Hutton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Hutton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Hutton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Hutton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Hutton. The network helps show where Deborah Hutton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Hutton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Hutton Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Hutton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1989340
2 200412
3
International Textbooks Revision. Examples from the United States
198711
4
Concepts and Trends in Global Education.
20016
5 20045
6
Solo parenting in New Zealand: Who are the children?
20013
7 20061
8 20141
9 20161
10 20071

About Deborah Hutton

Deborah Hutton is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Clinical Psychology, Anthropology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 10 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Therapy and Development (2 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (1 paper), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (1 paper), Legal Studies and Policies (1 paper), Financial Crisis of the 21st Century (1 paper), Legal Issues in South Africa (1 paper), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (1 paper) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (250 citations), Social Psychology (138 citations), Clinical Psychology (122 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (110 citations) and Pharmacy (17 citations). Deborah Hutton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul L. Harris, Carl N. Johnson, Tim Cooke, Howard D. Mehlinger and Margaret Sutton. Their work appears in journals such as History of Photography, Art History, Cognition & Emotion, South Asian Studies and Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact