Deborah Gioia

608 citations
25 papers · 419 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah Gioia

24 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

Deborah Gioia
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Family Practice 28
  • Public Administration 31
  • Clinical Psychology 116
  • General Health Professions 132
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 59
Replace Dahlia Fuentes with:
Dahlia Fuentes United States
Peter Huggard New Zealand
Janette Curtis Australia
Rochelle Einboden Australia
Karen Newbigging United Kingdom
Leonard Fagin United Kingdom
Micki Washburn United States
Marilyn Heins United States
Pamela J. Grace United States
Anne Felton United Kingdom
Deborah Gioia relative to Dahlia Fuentes United States Dahlia Fuentes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Dahlia Fuentes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Gioia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Gioia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Gioia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Gioia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Gioia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Gioia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Gioia. The network helps show where Deborah Gioia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Gioia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Gioia Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Gioia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201168
2 200857
3 201641
4 201336
5 201726
6 200824
7 201621
8 200519
9 200917
10 200614
11 200313
12 200913
13 200312
14 20219
15 20078
16 20067
17 20096
18 20136
19 20046
20 20146

About Deborah Gioia

Deborah Gioia is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (28 citations), Public Administration (31 citations), Clinical Psychology (116 citations), General Health Professions (132 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (59 citations). Deborah Gioia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Beth Barnet, Shiraz I. Mishra, Saltanat Childress, John S. Brekke, Claudia R. Baquet, Alicia Lucksted, Jacquelyn C. Campbell, Diana N. Carvajal, Pamela B. Brown and Elizabeth M. Aparicio. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, Community Mental Health Journal, American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Qualitative Health Research and Qualitative Social Work.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact