Deborah E. Crawford

2.8k citations
34 papers · 2.3k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah E. Crawford

33 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Deborah E. Crawford
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 566
  • Catalysis 288
  • Inorganic Chemistry 501
  • Organic Chemistry 731
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 60
Replace José A. Dobado with:
José A. Dobado Spain
Evelina Colacino France
William C. Shearouse United States
Mohammad Izadyar Iran
Pedro D. Vaz Portugal
Ram S. Mohan United States
Herwig Schottenberger Austria
Mariela M. Nolasco Portugal
Luís Mafra Portugal
Min Liang China
Deborah E. Crawford relative to José A. Dobado Spain José A. Dobado's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
José A. Dobado · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah E. Crawford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah E. Crawford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah E. Crawford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah E. Crawford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah E. Crawford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah E. Crawford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah E. Crawford. The network helps show where Deborah E. Crawford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah E. Crawford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah E. Crawford Line = papers co-authored together Deborah E. Crawford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015383
2 2017203
3 2010138
4 2016134
5 2016130
6 2021123
7 2017102
8 2018102
9 2022100
10 202099
11 201795
12 201877
13 201973
14 201766
15 201758
16 202045
17 201939
18 201738
19 202037
20 201834

About Deborah E. Crawford

Deborah E. Crawford is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallography and molecular interactions (10 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (8 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (5 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (5 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (3 papers) and Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (566 citations), Catalysis (288 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (501 citations), Organic Chemistry (731 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (60 citations). Deborah E. Crawford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stuart L. James, José Casabán, Tony McNally, Nicola Giri, Evelina Colacino, José G. Hernández, Gavin Walker, Ahmad B. Albadarin, Carsten Bolm and Qun Cao. Their work appears in journals such as Green Chemistry, Chemical Science, Chemical Communications, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact