Débora Corrêa

36 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

Débora Corrêa
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Signal Processing 104
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 101
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 45
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 54
  • Artificial Intelligence 78
Replace M. Kim with:
M. Kim United States
Granville Tunnicliffe‐Wilson United Kingdom
Pierre-François Marteau France
Sunitha Basodi United States
Christine Keribin France
M. M. Gabr Egypt
Namgil Lee South Korea
Jiulong Zhang China
Raphael Fuchs Switzerland
Pierce Lai United Kingdom
Débora Corrêa relative to M. Kim United States M. Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
M. Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Débora Corrêa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Débora Corrêa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Débora Corrêa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Débora Corrêa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Débora Corrêa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Débora Corrêa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Débora Corrêa. The network helps show where Débora Corrêa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Débora Corrêa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Débora Corrêa Line = papers co-authored together Débora Corrêa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201650
2 202339
3 201725
4 202124
5 201316
6 200814
7 201814
8 201812
9 201511
10 200911
11 202110
12 20228
13 20197
14 20225
15 20225
16 20204
17
Similarity graph: visual exploration of song collections
20154
18 20214
19 20113
20 20203

About Débora Corrêa

Débora Corrêa is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music and Audio Processing (10 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (9 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (7 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers), Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing (5 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers) and Time Series Analysis and Forecasting (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (104 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (101 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (45 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (54 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (78 citations). Débora Corrêa has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Francisco A. Rodrigues, Michael Small, David M. Walker, Thomas Stemler, Alexandre L. M. Levada, Luís Gustavo Nonato, Rodrigo Fernandes de Mello, Sally Thompson, John Duncan and Nelson D. A. Mascarenhas. Their work appears in journals such as Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, Expert Systems with Applications, Journal of New Music Research, Communications Physics and Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact