Dean Prichard

1.6k citations
17 papers · 1.0k · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Dean Prichard

17 papers receiving 951 citations

Peers

Dean Prichard
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 384
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 226
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 148
  • Economics and Econometrics 241
  • Signal Processing 75
Replace A. Witt with:
A. Witt Germany
Paolo Allegrini Italy
R. Eykholt United States
Herwig Wendt France
Christopher Essex Canada
Pierre‐Olivier Amblard France
Martin Vejmelka Czechia
Elizabeth Bradley United States
L.M. Hively United States
R. Friedrich Germany
Dean Prichard relative to A. Witt Germany A. Witt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
A. Witt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dean Prichard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dean Prichard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dean Prichard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dean Prichard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dean Prichard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dean Prichard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dean Prichard. The network helps show where Dean Prichard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Dean Prichard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dean Prichard Line = papers co-authored together Dean Prichard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1994466
2 1998123
3 1995108
4 199281
5
Constrained-Realization Monte-Carlo method for Hypothesis Testing
200767
6 199245
7 199431
8 199623
9 199321
10 199418
11
THE NON-LINEAR RESPONSE OF THE MAGNETOSPHERE: 30 OCTOBER 1978
20137
12 20147
13 19956
14 19954
15 20143
16 19951
17 19931

About Dean Prichard

Dean Prichard is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Molecular Biology, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Geophysics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (12 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (7 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (5 papers), Earthquake Detection and Analysis (3 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (3 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (3 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (2 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (384 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (226 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (148 citations), Economics and Econometrics (241 citations) and Signal Processing (75 citations). Dean Prichard has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James Theiler, C. P. Price, Cindy L. Ehlers, James W. Havstad, Jeffrey E. Bischoff, Joseph E. Borovsky, S. Knowlton, Jamaludin Mohd-Yusof, G.E. Sasser and Edward Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Physics Letters A, Geophysical Research Letters, Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact