Dean M. Cestari

3.2k citations
89 papers · 1.6k · h-index 21

Impact in

    • Retinal and Optic Conditions
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Neurology top 2%
    • Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

Papers in

Dean M. Cestari

83 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Dean M. Cestari
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Ophthalmology 322
  • Neurology 363
  • Internal Medicine 61
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 81
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 206
Replace Brian Owler with:
Brian Owler Australia
Susan P. Mollan United Kingdom
Christian Denier France
Giovanni Frisullo Italy
Indran Davagnanam United Kingdom
Angelo Lavano Italy
Yun Jung Bae South Korea
Gianni Boris Bradač Italy
Clare L. Fraser Australia
Brigitte Stemper Germany
Dean M. Cestari relative to Brian Owler Australia Brian Owler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Brian Owler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dean M. Cestari

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dean M. Cestari's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dean M. Cestari with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dean M. Cestari more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dean M. Cestari

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dean M. Cestari. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dean M. Cestari. The network helps show where Dean M. Cestari may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dean M. Cestari, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dean M. Cestari Line = papers co-authored together Dean M. Cestari links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004270
2 2016122
3 1994105
4 201288
5 201674
6 201846
7 201841
8 199540
9 199436
10 199633
11 201833
12 201832
13 200832
14 201628
15 201727
16 201027
17 201825
18 201625
19 201122
20 202021

About Dean M. Cestari

Dean M. Cestari is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Ophthalmology, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (13 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (11 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (11 papers), Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects (7 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (7 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (5 papers) and Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (322 citations), Neurology (363 citations), Internal Medicine (61 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (81 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (206 citations). Dean M. Cestari has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Elisabeth J. Van Bockstaele, Joseph F. Rizzo, Lisa M. DeAngelis, Virginia M. Pickel, Douglas M. Weine, K. Panageas, Alan Z. Segal, Eric D. Gaier, John B. Miller and Simmons Lessell. Their work appears in journals such as Seminars in Ophthalmology, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Neurology, New England Journal of Medicine and JAMA Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact