Dean Cocking
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
-
- Ethics in Business and Education
Papers in
-
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 4
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 1
-
- Free Will and Agency 4
- Co-authors
- Justin Oakley (4 shared papers)Jeanette Kennett (2 shared papers)Steve Matthews (2 shared papers)Jeroen van den Hoven (2 shared papers)Seumas Miller (2 shared papers)Luciano Floridi (1 shared paper)Terrell Ward Bynum (1 shared paper)James H. Moor (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ethics and Information Technology (2 papers)Ethics (2 papers)Metamedicine (1 paper)Utilitas (1 paper)The Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Dean Cocking
11 papers receiving 484 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Philosophy 157
- Information Systems and Management 51
- Safety Research 54
- Cognitive Neuroscience 123
- Communication 36
Countries citing papers authored by Dean Cocking
This map shows the geographic impact of Dean Cocking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dean Cocking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dean Cocking more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dean Cocking
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dean Cocking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dean Cocking. The network helps show where Dean Cocking may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Dean Cocking, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 194 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 110 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 89 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 63 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 41 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 12 | Professionalization, Ethics and Integrity | 2006 | 1 |
About Dean Cocking
Dean Cocking is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Communication and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 12 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (157 citations), Information Systems and Management (51 citations), Safety Research (54 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (123 citations) and Communication (36 citations). Dean Cocking has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Justin Oakley, Jeanette Kennett, Steve Matthews, Jeroen van den Hoven, Seumas Miller, Luciano Floridi, Terrell Ward Bynum, James H. Moor, Deborah G. Johnson and Dag Elgesem. Their work appears in journals such as Ethics and Information Technology, Ethics, Metamedicine, Utilitas and The Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.