D.E. Prentice

479 citations
33 papers · 397 · h-index 12

Impact in

    • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
    • Animal testing and alternatives
  • Equine top 10%

Papers in

D.E. Prentice

33 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

D.E. Prentice
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Small Animals 65
  • Equine 14
  • Chemical Health and Safety 4
  • Physiology 24
  • Cancer Research 58
Replace Ingrid Brück Bøgh with:
Ingrid Brück Bøgh Denmark
Tara E. Nicholson United Kingdom
Karen H. Wright United States
C. Schock United States
Noel D.M. Lehner United States
G. C. Schofield Australia
Jang‐Hyuk Yun South Korea
D. Buck Hales United States
Małgorzata Grzesiak Poland
Magdalena Souhrada United States
D.E. Prentice relative to Ingrid Brück Bøgh Denmark Ingrid Brück Bøgh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Ingrid Brück Bøgh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D.E. Prentice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.E. Prentice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.E. Prentice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.E. Prentice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.E. Prentice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.E. Prentice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.E. Prentice. The network helps show where D.E. Prentice may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D.E. Prentice, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D.E. Prentice Line = papers co-authored together D.E. Prentice links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The ultrastructure of rat laryngeal epithelia.
198046
2
Safety evaluation of toothpaste containing chloroform. III. Long-term study in beagle dogs.
197931
3 197327
4 197923
5 197921
6 198020
7 200119
8 198718
9 198218
10 198318
11 197813
12 197413
13 200211
14 198010
15 198110
16 20029
17 19878
18 19948
19 19768
20 19877

About D.E. Prentice

D.E. Prentice is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology, Physiology and Equine, having authored 33 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (5 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (3 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (3 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (2 papers), Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (2 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (65 citations), Equine (14 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (4 citations), Physiology (24 citations) and Cancer Research (58 citations). D.E. Prentice has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include David J. Lewis, Chirukandath Gopinath, Rebecca L. Heywood, R. L. Gregson, G. WYN‐JONES, Peter F. Wadsworth, Francis J. C. Roe, Susanna M.O. Hourani, Robert A. Ettlin and David John Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology Letters, Toxicology, Laboratory Animals, Veterinary Pathology and Research in Veterinary Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact