D.E. Prentice

475 citations
27 papers · 319 · h-index 11

Impact in

  • Equine top 10%
    • Veterinary Equine Medical Research
    • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
    • Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Papers in

D.E. Prentice

27 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers

D.E. Prentice
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Equine 13
  • Small Animals 55
  • Chemical Health and Safety 4
  • Physiology 24
  • Cancer Research 40
Replace Tom O. Abney with:
Tom O. Abney United States
M. Souhrada United States
IG Jarrett Australia
G. F. Weinbauer India
Ghanim Almahbobi Australia
Alexandra Wendler Germany
Ruth Tal Israel
Joseph T. Velardo United States
M. H. Briggs Australia
Katarzyna Knapczyk‐Stwora Poland
D.E. Prentice relative to Tom O. Abney United States Tom O. Abney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tom O. Abney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D.E. Prentice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.E. Prentice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.E. Prentice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.E. Prentice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.E. Prentice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.E. Prentice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.E. Prentice. The network helps show where D.E. Prentice may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D.E. Prentice, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D.E. Prentice Line = papers co-authored together D.E. Prentice links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The ultrastructure of rat laryngeal epithelia.
198042
2
Safety evaluation of toothpaste containing chloroform. III. Long-term study in beagle dogs.
197928
3 197328
4 197921
5 197919
6 200119
7 198218
8 198016
9 198315
10 197412
11 200211
12 19789
13 20029
14 19949
15 19818
16 19797
17 19807
18 19817
19 19766
20 19736

About D.E. Prentice

D.E. Prentice is a scholar working on Surgery, Physiology, Small Animals, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (4 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (2 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers) and Veterinary Equine Medical Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (13 citations), Small Animals (55 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (4 citations), Physiology (24 citations) and Cancer Research (40 citations). D.E. Prentice has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include D. J. Lewis, R. Heywood, R. L. Gregson, Susanna M.O. Hourani, Robert A. Ettlin, F. J. C. Roe, Saima Majeed, G. WYN‐JONES, P.F. Wadsworth and R. S. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology Letters, Laboratory Animals, Toxicology, Research in Veterinary Science and Veterinary Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact