C. Schock

450 citations
16 papers · 369 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

C. Schock

15 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

C. Schock
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Pharmaceutical Science 106
  • Urology 50
  • Equine 14
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 95
  • Dermatology 23
Replace G Brauner with:
G Brauner United States
Peter Flesch United States
Xiran Lin China
Ronald J. Trancik United States
Charles G. Hurst United States
Hasse Schröder Sweden
Giancarlo B. Fregnan Italy
Hee J. Kim United States
Juyeon Seo South Korea
J. Schrager United Kingdom
C. Schock relative to G Brauner United States G Brauner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.5×
G Brauner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Schock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Schock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Schock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Schock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Schock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Schock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Schock. The network helps show where C. Schock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside C. Schock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Schock Line = papers co-authored together C. Schock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 196990
2 196947
3 199335
4 197732
5
The development of the lung and its surfactant in the foal and in other species.
197527
6 199225
7 197223
8 197417
9 197315
10
Lung surfactant and organelles after an exposure to dibenzoxazepine (CR).
197415
11
Ultrastructure of inclusion bodies in type II cells of lung, human and sub-simian.
197412
12 197211
13 197211
14
Post-mortem changes at electron microscope level in the type II cells of the lung.
19748
15
Mitochondrial lamellated bodies and surfactant depots in the Type II cells of the lung compared by bimetallic staining and X-ray analysis.
19801
16 20060

About C. Schock

C. Schock is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pharmaceutical Science, Urology, Anatomy and Structural Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (9 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (3 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (3 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (2 papers), Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies (2 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (1 paper), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper) and Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (106 citations), Urology (50 citations), Equine (14 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (95 citations) and Dermatology (23 citations). C. Schock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard E. Pattle, J. Fletcher, Joy L. Hambrook, P. Dirnhuber, G. M. Hughes, PETER D. ROSSDALE, G. Gandy and N. H. Creasey. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Dermatology, Xenobiotica, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Journal of Zoology and Journal of Microscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact