DC Van Essen
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Face Recognition and Perception
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 6
- Neural dynamics and brain function 5
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 3
- Co-authors
- John H. R. Maunsell (1 shared paper)Andreas Burkhalter (1 shared paper)WT Newsome (1 shared paper)John L. Bixby (1 shared paper)Simon LeVay (1 shared paper)Mary Connolly (1 shared paper)J.M. Allman (1 shared paper)Peter T. Fox (1 shared paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
DC Van Essen
8 papers receiving 2.9k citations
DC Van Essen's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.8k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 620
- Neurology 209
- Sensory Systems 107
- Ophthalmology 149
Countries citing papers authored by DC Van Essen
This map shows the geographic impact of DC Van Essen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by DC Van Essen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites DC Van Essen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by DC Van Essen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by DC Van Essen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by DC Van Essen. The network helps show where DC Van Essen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside DC Van Essen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey Hit paper breakdown → | 1983 | 1371 |
| 2 | A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information Hit paper breakdown → | 1993 | 718 |
| 3 | 1987 | 286 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 279 | |
| 5 | 1986 | 249 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 237 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 47 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 3 |
About DC Van Essen
DC Van Essen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (1 paper), Color Science and Applications (1 paper), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.8k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (620 citations), Neurology (209 citations), Sensory Systems (107 citations) and Ophthalmology (149 citations). DC Van Essen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John H. R. Maunsell, Andreas Burkhalter, WT Newsome, John L. Bixby, Simon LeVay, Mary Connolly, J.M. Allman, Peter T. Fox, Edward M. Callaway and Maurizio Corbetta. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.