D.C Piper

3.0k citations
23 papers · 1.5k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

D.C Piper

23 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

D.C Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 645
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 731
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 450
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 588
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 44
Replace Jane E. Cluderay with:
Jane E. Cluderay United Kingdom
László Détári Hungary
Arthur S. Foutz France
Romain Goutagny France
Rick L. Pieschl United States
Claude Gottesmann France
Héctor Jantos Uruguay
Emi Hasegawa Japan
Shojiro Inoué Japan
Guillaume Hervieu United Kingdom
D.C Piper relative to Jane E. Cluderay United Kingdom Jane E. Cluderay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jane E. Cluderay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D.C Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.C Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.C Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.C Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.C Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.C Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.C Piper. The network helps show where D.C Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D.C Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D.C Piper Line = papers co-authored together D.C Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000282
2 2000254
3 1996211
4 2001196
5 200096
6 200363
7 199354
8 199551
9 199748
10 198248
11 199837
12 201432
13 200231
14 199328
15 197722
16 199018
17 200117
18 19789
19 19959
20 19945

About D.C Piper

D.C Piper is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Physiology and Social Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (6 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (6 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (3 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (3 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (645 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (731 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (450 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (588 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (44 citations). D.C Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Neil Upton, Martin Smith, A. Jackie Hunter, N. Upton, Jackie Cilia, David R. Thomas, G.A. Kennett, Thomas P. Blackburn, Jonathan R.S. Arch and John E. Blundell. Their work appears in journals such as Psychopharmacology, European Journal of Neuroscience, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior and SLEEP.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact