David Wiles

1.7k citations
57 papers · 696 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

David Wiles

41 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

David Wiles
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Anthropology 289
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 123
  • Music 61
  • Literature and Literary Theory 187
  • Classics 64
Replace Bernard F. Dick with:
Bernard F. Dick United States
Jonathan Crewe United States
Helene P. Foley United States
Edith Hall United Kingdom
Oliver Taplin United States
Denis Hollier
Éric Csapo Canada
Christopher Ricks United States
Christopher Stray United Kingdom
Eva C. Keuls
David Wiles relative to Bernard F. Dick United States Bernard F. Dick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Bernard F. Dick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Wiles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Wiles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Wiles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Wiles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Wiles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Wiles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Wiles. The network helps show where David Wiles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Wiles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Wiles Line = papers co-authored together David Wiles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199786
2
A short history of Western performance space
200385
3 200772
4 198755
5 198854
6
Mask and Performance in Greek Tragedy: From Ancient Festival to Modern Experimentation
200743
7 200338
8 199428
9 200027
10 198425
11 201024
12
Gerontological social work
200123
13 202021
14 200115
15
The Masks of Menander
199114
16 198510
17 20129
18 19969
19 20148
20 19875

About David Wiles

David Wiles is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Literature and Literary Theory and Philosophy, having authored 57 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (17 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (9 papers), Philippine History and Culture (5 papers), Contemporary and Historical Greek Studies (5 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (4 papers), Irish and British Studies (3 papers) and Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (289 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (123 citations), Music (61 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (187 citations) and Classics (64 citations). David Wiles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. King, Éric Csapo, Graham Ley, Sander M. Goldberg, John Walton, Rush Rehm, Richard Beacham, Gonda Van Steen, Richard Green and Fritz Graf. Their work appears in journals such as New Theatre Quarterly, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, The Modern Language Review, The Classical World and Theatre Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact