David W. Ewing

22 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

David W. Ewing
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 246
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 43
  • Organic Chemistry 133
  • Spectroscopy 67
  • Information Systems and Management 27
Replace John Whitmer with:
John Whitmer United States
John Christie Australia
William H. Taylor United States
Judith C. Giordan United States
W. B. Fox United States
Laurie M. Yoder United States
L. Wood United States
İlker Özkan Türkiye
Austin P. Spencer United States
R. HOPPE Germany
David W. Ewing relative to John Whitmer United States John Whitmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
John Whitmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David W. Ewing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David W. Ewing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David W. Ewing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David W. Ewing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David W. Ewing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David W. Ewing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David W. Ewing. The network helps show where David W. Ewing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David W. Ewing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David W. Ewing Line = papers co-authored together David W. Ewing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988120
2 198268
3 198336
4 198932
5 198331
6 198728
7
Long-range planning for management
197222
8 199521
9
The managerial mind
196416
10 199113
11
The human side of planning : tool or tyrant?
196910
12 199110
13 198310
14
The practice of planning
19688
15 20136
16
Incentives for executives
19624
17 19922
18 19802
19 19711
20 19631

About David W. Ewing

David W. Ewing is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Catalysis and Spectroscopy, having authored 22 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (3 papers), Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (3 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (2 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (1 paper) and Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (246 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (43 citations), Organic Chemistry (133 citations), Spectroscopy (67 citations) and Information Systems and Management (27 citations). David W. Ewing has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gary V. Pfeiffer, R. F. Ferrante, K. J. Zeringue, R. J. Van Zee, W. Weltner, Richard P. Nielsen, Yun‐Soo Kim, M. Tenhover, Alfred B. Anderson and Robert K. Grasselli. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration Review, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Physics Letters and Journal of Marketing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact