David Van Hoofstat
Impact in
- Genetics top 10%
- Forensic and Genetic Research
- Biophysics top 10%
Papers in
-
- Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications 9
- Identification and Quantification in Food 2
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 2
- Genetics 7
- Forensic and Genetic Research 7
- Co-authors
- Dieter Deforce (12 shared papers)Filip Van Nieuwerburgh (7 shared papers)Mado Vandewoestyne (6 shared papers)Christophe Van Neste (3 shared papers)Maarten Dhaenens (1 shared paper)Katleen Van Steendam (1 shared paper)Aimée J P M Franssen (1 shared paper)Elfriede G. Van den Eeckhout (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Forensic Science International Genetics (5 papers)International Journal of Legal Medicine (3 papers)Journal of Forensic Sciences (1 paper)Journal of Chromatography A (1 paper)Science & Justice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Belgium
In The Last Decade
David Van Hoofstat
12 papers receiving 462 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Genetics 265
- Biophysics 32
- Molecular Biology 332
- Ecology 120
- Safety Research 29
Countries citing papers authored by David Van Hoofstat
This map shows the geographic impact of David Van Hoofstat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Van Hoofstat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Van Hoofstat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Van Hoofstat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Van Hoofstat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Van Hoofstat. The network helps show where David Van Hoofstat may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside David Van Hoofstat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 102 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 70 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 33 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 12 | DNA typing of Fingerprints and Skin Debris: Sensitivity of Capillary Electrophoresis in Forensic Applications using Multiplex PCR | 1998 | 11 |
About David Van Hoofstat
David Van Hoofstat is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Ecology, Safety Research and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 475 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (7 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (2 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (1 paper) and Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (265 citations), Biophysics (32 citations), Molecular Biology (332 citations), Ecology (120 citations) and Safety Research (29 citations). David Van Hoofstat has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Dieter Deforce, Filip Van Nieuwerburgh, Mado Vandewoestyne, Christophe Van Neste, Maarten Dhaenens, Katleen Van Steendam, Aimée J P M Franssen, Elfriede G. Van den Eeckhout, Yannick Gansemans and Dieter De Coninck. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International Genetics, International Journal of Legal Medicine, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Journal of Chromatography A and Science & Justice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.