David Thomas

626 citations
57 papers · 400 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

David Thomas

41 papers receiving 260 citations

Peers

David Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Space and Planetary Science 46
  • Classics 75
  • Archeology 123
  • Archeology 11
  • Anthropology 95
Replace Michael Aston with:
Michael Aston United Kingdom
David Blackman United Kingdom
Michael Given United Kingdom
G. D. B. Jones United Kingdom
Leslie Alcock United Kingdom
Robert Witcher United Kingdom
Nicola Terrenato United States
W.J.H. Willems Netherlands
Martin Millett United Kingdom
Penelope M. Allison United Kingdom
David Thomas relative to Michael Aston United Kingdom Michael Aston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Michael Aston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Thomas. The network helps show where David Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Thomas Line = papers co-authored together David Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200162
2 199839
3 199738
4 200329
5 201125
6
Excavations at Kilise Tepe, 1994-98: From Bronze Age to Byzantine in Western Cilicia
200724
7 201718
8 199816
9
The Archaeology Sites of Afghanistan in Google Earth
200815
10 202314
11 200110
12 20139
13 19898
14 19997
15 20077
16 19876
17 20186
18 20066
19
The architectural legacy of the seasonally nomadic Ghurids
20165
20 20165

About David Thomas

David Thomas is a scholar working on Archeology, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science and Space and Planetary Science, having authored 57 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Historical Studies (11 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (7 papers), Islamic Studies and History (7 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (6 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (6 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (4 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (3 papers) and African Studies and Geopolitics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (46 citations), Classics (75 citations), Archeology (123 citations), Archeology (11 citations) and Anthropology (95 citations). David Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include J. N. Postgate, David Mattingly, Sue McLaren, Oliver Creighton, Graeme Barker, D. D. Gilbertson, Chris Hunt, Paul Newson, John Grattan and Richard A. Cosgrove. Their work appears in journals such as Libyan Studies, Levant, The Economic History Review, Geographical Journal and Journal of Field Archaeology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact