Robert Larmer

537 citations
47 papers · 330 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Larmer

38 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Robert Larmer
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Information Systems and Management 84
  • Philosophy 106
  • History and Philosophy of Science 36
  • Religious studies 29
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 38
Replace Francis T. Fallon with:
Francis T. Fallon United States
A. T. Nuyen Australia
Michael Slater United States
Stanley L. Paulson United States
P. Christopher Smith United States
Dominic Scott United Kingdom
Gustav Mueller
James K. A. Smith United States
Wibren van der Burg Netherlands
Stephen Houlgate United Kingdom
Robert Larmer relative to Francis T. Fallon United States Francis T. Fallon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Francis T. Fallon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Larmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Larmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Larmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Larmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Larmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Larmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Larmer. The network helps show where Robert Larmer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Robert Larmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Larmer Line = papers co-authored together Robert Larmer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992115
2 198843
3 201125
4 198613
5 199512
6
Ethics in the Workplace: Selected Readings in Business Ethics
200110
7 199710
8 19969
9 19848
10 19857
11 20097
12
Water into wine
19887
13 20026
14 20115
15 20035
16 20045
17 20134
18 19924
19 20093
20 19883

About Robert Larmer

Robert Larmer is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies and Social Psychology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (10 papers), Evolution and Science Education (9 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (7 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (5 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (3 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers) and Historical Philosophy and Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (84 citations), Philosophy (106 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (36 citations), Religious studies (29 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (38 citations). Robert Larmer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rupert Gethin, Benedicta Ward, Colin Brown, Michael P. Levine, James Carleton Paget, Niels Christian Hvidt, David Thomas, David Basinger, Roland B. Walter and Robert Garland. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophia Christi, Sophia, Journal of Business Ethics, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Toronto Journal of Theology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact