David Swallow
Impact in
- Human Factors and Ergonomics top 0.5%
- Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Occupational Therapy top 2%
- Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Papers in
-
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 3
- Usability and User Interface Design 3
- Persona Design and Applications 2
-
- Digital Accessibility for Disabilities 4
- Co-authors
- Helen Petrie (6 shared papers)Christopher Power (5 shared papers)André Pimenta Freire (1 shared paper)Peter Wright (1 shared paper)Mark Blythe (1 shared paper)Rose Gilroy (1 shared paper)Katia Attuyer (1 shared paper)Howard Cambridge (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Urban Health (1 paper)Studies in health technology and informatics (3 papers)Art Libraries Journal (1 paper)White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
David Swallow
8 papers receiving 304 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 213
- Occupational Therapy 90
- Human-Computer Interaction 91
- Cognitive Neuroscience 106
- Computer Science Applications 31
Countries citing papers authored by David Swallow
This map shows the geographic impact of David Swallow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Swallow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Swallow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Swallow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Swallow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Swallow. The network helps show where David Swallow may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside David Swallow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 224 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 4 | The value chain for web accessibility : challenges and opportunities | 2011 | 8 |
| 5 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 1 |
About David Swallow
David Swallow is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Occupational Therapy, Demography and Health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (4 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (3 papers), Persona Design and Applications (2 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (2 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (1 paper) and Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (213 citations), Occupational Therapy (90 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (91 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (106 citations) and Computer Science Applications (31 citations). David Swallow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Helen Petrie, Christopher Power, André Pimenta Freire, Peter Wright, Mark Blythe, Rose Gilroy, Katia Attuyer, Howard Cambridge, Steve Cinderby and Mark Bevan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Urban Health, Studies in health technology and informatics, Art Libraries Journal and White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.