David Schult

424 citations
11 papers · 238 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Gut microbiota and health 3
    • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 1
    • Inflammasome and immune disorders 1
    • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 3
    • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments 1

David Schult

11 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

David Schult
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
  • Hematology 48
  • Infectious Diseases 44
  • Neurology 30
  • Genetics 21
Replace Natalie Vaninov with:
Natalie Vaninov United States
Michael Wilmot United States
Hanns‐Martin Lorenz Germany
Koray Yalçın Türkiye
Ernesto Cairoli Uruguay
Leuridan Cavalcante Torres Brazil
Guido Morcaldi Italy
Lai Xu Canada
Federica Defendi France
Poonam Ghai United Kingdom
David Schult relative to Natalie Vaninov United States Natalie Vaninov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Natalie Vaninov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Schult

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Schult's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Schult with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Schult more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Schult

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Schult. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Schult. The network helps show where David Schult may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Schult, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Schult Line = papers co-authored together David Schult links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 202261
2 202047
3 201637
4 202319
5 202319
6 201516
7 202115
8 201914
9 20148
10 20221
11 20191

About David Schult

David Schult is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Hematology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery and Infectious Diseases, having authored 11 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (3 papers), Gut microbiota and health (3 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper), Liver Disease and Transplantation (1 paper), Hormonal and reproductive studies (1 paper), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (1 paper) and Inflammasome and immune disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (11 citations), Hematology (48 citations), Infectious Diseases (44 citations), Neurology (30 citations) and Genetics (21 citations). David Schult has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Rolf Buslei, Michael Buchfelder, Annett Hölsken, Carsten Müller‐Tidow, Aleksandar Radujkovic, Thomas Luft, Tobias Lahmer, Igor Wolfgang Blau, Lars Bullinger and Olaf Penack. Their work appears in journals such as Gut Microbes, Haematologica, Scientific Reports, Pituitary and Bone Marrow Transplantation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact