David Rowe

324 papers receiving 11.7k citations

Peers

David Rowe
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.7k
  • Gender Studies 2.7k
  • Clinical Psychology 3.8k
  • Communication 992
  • Sociology and Political Science 5.1k
Replace Howard Giles with:
Howard Giles United States
Patricia M. Greenfield United States
Aletha C. Huston United States
Kay Deaux United States
Felicia Pratto United States
Jennifer Crocker United States
Leonard Berkowitz United States
Eleanor E. Maccoby United States
Janet T. Spence United States
Michael I. Norton United States
David Rowe relative to Howard Giles United States Howard Giles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Howard Giles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Rowe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Rowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Rowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Rowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Rowe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Rowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Rowe. The network helps show where David Rowe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Rowe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Rowe Line = papers co-authored together David Rowe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 341 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995417
2 1998388
3 1977354
4 1999317
5 1981263
6 1990248
7 1994235
8
Sport, culture and the media : the unruly trinity
2004224
9 1984221
10
A biometrical analysis of perceptions of family environment: a study of twin and singleton sibling kinships.
1983214
11 2000198
12 1981195
13 1998183
14 1983175
15 1992171
16 1997166
17 1999161
18 2012157
19 2007151
20 1993148

About David Rowe

David Rowe is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 341 papers that have together received 13.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (102 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (96 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (71 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (33 papers), Digital Games and Media (30 papers), Media Studies and Communication (25 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (20 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.7k citations), Gender Studies (2.7k citations), Clinical Psychology (3.8k citations), Communication (992 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (5.1k citations). David Rowe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Lee Rodgers, Robert Plomin, Kristen C. Jacobson, Brett Hutchins, Daniel J. Flannery, Janet L. Lauritsen, Edwin J. C. G. van den Oord, Alexander T. Vazsonyi, Geoffrey Lawrence and D. Wayne Osgood. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychology, Behavior Genetics, Intelligence, Psychological Review and International Review for the Sociology of Sport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact