David Rouben
Impact in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Surgery top 10%
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Papers in
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 7
- Surgery 6
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 5
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 1
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 1
- Co-authors
- James D. Schwender (3 shared papers)Kevin T. Foley (3 shared papers)Langston T. Holly (3 shared papers)Michael Ferguson (1 shared paper)Mladen Djurasovic (2 shared papers)Steven D. Glassman (2 shared papers)Leah Y. Carreon (2 shared papers)Garrick W. Cason (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Spine Journal (3 papers)Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques (2 papers)Neurosurgical FOCUS (1 paper)PubMed (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
David Rouben
8 papers receiving 799 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 653
- Surgery 388
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 43
- Pharmacology 84
- Biomedical Engineering 87
Countries citing papers authored by David Rouben
This map shows the geographic impact of David Rouben's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Rouben with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Rouben more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Rouben
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Rouben. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Rouben. The network helps show where David Rouben may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside David Rouben, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 451 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 238 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 94 | |
| 4 | A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion plus intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for ripening the cervix and inducing labor in patients with unfavorable cervices. | 1993 | 46 |
| 5 | Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open TLIF: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study. | 2016 | 19 |
| 6 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 1 |
About David Rouben
David Rouben is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Pharmacology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 853 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (1 paper) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (653 citations), Surgery (388 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (43 citations), Pharmacology (84 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (87 citations). David Rouben has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include James D. Schwender, Kevin T. Foley, Langston T. Holly, Michael Ferguson, Mladen Djurasovic, Steven D. Glassman, Leah Y. Carreon and Garrick W. Cason. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, Neurosurgical FOCUS and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.