Peter Försth

1.4k citations
19 papers · 1.1k · 1 hit paper · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Försth

17 papers receiving 1k citations

Peter Försth's Hit Papers

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis 2016 · 647 citations
6470+3+6Years since publication200400600

Peers

Peter Försth
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 830
  • Pharmacology 104
  • Surgery 177
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 14
Replace Andrew Glennie with:
Andrew Glennie Canada
Michael Longley United States
Dil V. Patel United States
Friederike Lattig Germany
Christopher R. Howe United States
William W. Long United States
Zoya Bauer United States
Wade M. King United States
Jennifer Malone United States
Brandon P. Hirsch United States
Peter Försth relative to Andrew Glennie Canada Andrew Glennie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.6×
Andrew Glennie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Försth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Försth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Försth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Försth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Försth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Försth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Försth. The network helps show where Peter Försth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Försth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Försth Line = papers co-authored together Peter Försth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Hit paper breakdown →
2016647
2 2011125
3 2013115
4 201176
5 202226
6 202218
7 20249
8 20227
9 20227
10 20186
11 20214
12 20183
13
[Lumbar disc prosthesis, a high risk treatment for low back pain.]
20202
14 20242
15 20191
16 20241
17 20251
18 20210
19 20260

About Peter Försth

Peter Försth is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (13 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (4 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper) and Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (830 citations), Pharmacology (104 citations), Surgery (177 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (14 citations). Peter Försth has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Karl Michaëlsson, Bengt Sandén, Patrik Öhagen, Fredrik Borgström, Gylfi Ólafsson, Peter Fritzell, Yohan Robinson, Claes Olerud, Christoph Eckhard Heyde and Cecilia Persson. Their work appears in journals such as The Bone & Joint Journal, Spine, Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact