David Rotermund

511 citations
20 papers · 304 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

David Rotermund

19 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

David Rotermund
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 238
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 107
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 66
  • Artificial Intelligence 62
  • Signal Processing 17
Replace Aonan Tang with:
Aonan Tang United States
Kukjin Kang United States
Hyoungsoo Yoon United States
Jason Prentice United States
Jeremy Lewi United States
Liang Cao China
Guido Gigante Italy
Arno Onken United Kingdom
Ryan C. Kelly United States
James M. Rebesco United States
David Rotermund relative to Aonan Tang United States Aonan Tang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Aonan Tang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Rotermund

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Rotermund's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Rotermund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Rotermund more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Rotermund

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Rotermund. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Rotermund. The network helps show where David Rotermund may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside David Rotermund, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Rotermund Line = papers co-authored together David Rotermund links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200277
2 200345
3 201433
4 200920
5 200319
6 201317
7 201816
8 200614
9 201911
10 200311
11 201310
12 20137
13 20217
14 20196
15 20075
16 20172
17 20202
18 20231
19 20111
20
Binary Tuning is Optimal for Neural Rate Coding with High Temporal Resolution
20020

About David Rotermund

David Rotermund is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 20 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (12 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (12 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers), Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices (4 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (238 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (107 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (66 citations), Artificial Intelligence (62 citations) and Signal Processing (17 citations). David Rotermund has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Pawelzik, Matthias Bethge, Udo Ernst, Andreas K. Kreiter, Sunita Mandon, Iris Grothe, Alberto García-Ortiz, Martin Schneider, Steffen Paul and Walter Lang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Network Computation in Neural Systems, Neural Computation, Biological Cybernetics and HardwareX.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact