David Pothier

3.5k citations
118 papers · 3k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

David Pothier

116 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

David Pothier
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.7k
  • Global and Planetary Change 899
  • Ecology 549
  • Insect Science 201
  • Ecological Modeling 27
Replace James N. Long with:
James N. Long United States
Ulrich Kohnle Germany
Zdeněk Vacek Czechia
Louis De Grandpré Canada
Laurent Bergès France
Catherine Collet France
Lars Drößler Sweden
Don William Butler Australia
Benoı̂t Courbaud France
Bertil Westerlund Sweden
David Pothier relative to James N. Long United States James N. Long's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
James N. Long · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Pothier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Pothier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Pothier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Pothier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Pothier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Pothier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Pothier. The network helps show where David Pothier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Pothier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Pothier Line = papers co-authored together David Pothier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 118 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008179
2 1989100
3 200394
4 201691
5 200373
6 201173
7 200269
8 201069
9 198968
10 200367
11 200957
12 200254
13 199151
14 201051
15 200950
16 198848
17 199547
18 200445
19 201441
20 200740

About David Pothier

David Pothier is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Atmospheric Science and Building and Construction, having authored 118 papers that have together received 3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (64 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (11 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (11 papers), Forest Management and Policy (11 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (8 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (7 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.7k citations), Global and Planetary Change (899 citations), Ecology (549 citations), Insect Science (201 citations) and Ecological Modeling (27 citations). David Pothier has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Iran and France. Frequent co-authors include Mathieu Bouchard, Marcel Prévost, Alexis Achim, Hank A. Margolis, Sylvie Gauthier, Frédéric Raulier, Julien Béguin, Daniel Mailly, Richard H. Waring and Steeve D. Côté. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Forest Ecology and Management, Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research, The Forestry Chronicle and Annals of Forest Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact