David Piot

556 citations
56 papers · 453 · h-index 13

Impact in

    • Metallurgy and Material Forming
    • Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
    • Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
    • Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
    • High Temperature Alloys and Creep

Papers in

David Piot

52 papers receiving 434 citations

Peers

David Piot
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Mechanics of Materials 282
  • Mechanical Engineering 326
  • Materials Chemistry 328
  • Aerospace Engineering 121
  • Metals and Alloys 6
Replace M. Goerdeler with:
M. Goerdeler Germany
Ursula Weidig Germany
Mischa Crumbach Germany
M. Miszczyk Poland
A. Morozova Russia
Zhe Chai China
Juan M. Massone Argentina
A. S. Aleshchenko Russia
Yan-Yong Ma China
Grzegorz Korpała Germany
David Piot relative to M. Goerdeler Germany M. Goerdeler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
M. Goerdeler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Piot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Piot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Piot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Piot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Piot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Piot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Piot. The network helps show where David Piot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Piot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Piot Line = papers co-authored together David Piot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199648
2 200637
3 200936
4 200525
5 201325
6 201423
7 201221
8 201019
9 200918
10 200616
11 200416
12 200213
13 201313
14 201012
15 201811
16 200210
17 20208
18 20088
19 20027
20 20196

About David Piot

David Piot is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 56 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microstructure and mechanical properties (37 papers), Metallurgy and Material Forming (36 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (17 papers), Metal Forming Simulation Techniques (14 papers), Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (11 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (4 papers), Advanced materials and composites (4 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanics of Materials (282 citations), Mechanical Engineering (326 citations), Materials Chemistry (328 citations), Aerospace Engineering (121 citations) and Metals and Alloys (6 citations). David Piot has collaborated with scholars based in France, Algeria and United States. Frequent co-authors include J.H. Driver, F. Montheillet, Romain Quey, Christophe Desrayaud, Claire Maurice, Helmut Klöcker, Guillaume Kermouche, Damien Fabrègue, Éric Maire and Yuichiro Koizumi. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Materialia, Materials Science and Engineering A, Journal of Materials Science, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A and Scripta Materialia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact