David Novitz

1.4k citations
46 papers · 496 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Visual Culture and Art Theory 10
    • Art History and Market Analysis 2
    • Art, Politics, and Modernism 2
    • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art 5
    • Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity 3
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2

David Novitz

37 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

David Novitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 86
  • Philosophy 122
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 89
  • Literature and Literary Theory 54
  • General Psychology 6
Replace Richard C. McCleary with:
Richard C. McCleary
Crispin Sartwell United States
Noël Carroll United States
Ronald W. Hepburn United Kingdom
Paisley Livingston Hong Kong
Francis Sparshott Canada
Thomas E. Wartenberg United States
Leonard Lawlor United States
Donald M. Lowe
Elmer H. Duncan United States
David Novitz relative to Richard C. McCleary Richard C. McCleary's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Richard C. McCleary · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Novitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Novitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Novitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Novitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Novitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Novitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Novitz. The network helps show where David Novitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside David Novitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Novitz Line = papers co-authored together David Novitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Culture and identity in New Zealand
198983
2 199848
3
Knowledge, fiction, and imagination
198737
4 199434
5 199930
6 199129
7 197727
8 198926
9 198725
10 198318
11
The boundaries of art
199215
12 198014
13 200112
14 199210
15 200010
16 19968
17 19908
18 20006
19 19955
20 19895

About David Novitz

David Novitz is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Philosophy, Law, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual Culture and Art Theory (10 papers), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (5 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (3 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (2 papers) and Art, Politics, and Modernism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (86 citations), Philosophy (122 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (89 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (54 citations) and General Psychology (6 citations). David Novitz has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Gary Iseminger, Marcia Muelder Eaton, Arthur C. Danto, Noël Carroll and Peter J. McCormick. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, The British Journal of Aesthetics, Philosophy and literature, Grazer Philosophische Studien and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact