Nigel Smith
Impact in
Papers in
- History 28
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 14
- Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory 11
-
- Cassava research and cyanide 5
- Co-authors
- André Luiz Atroch (1 shared paper)Nicholas von Maltzahn (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Tuttle (1 shared paper)Tony Davies (1 shared paper)Cedric C. Brown (1 shared paper)Blair Worden (1 shared paper)Martin Dzelzainis (1 shared paper)Thomas N. Corns (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Prose Studies (3 papers)Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (3 papers)Women s Writing (2 papers)The Modern Language Review (2 papers)Journal of Historical Geography (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Nigel Smith
62 papers receiving 518 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- History 295
- Classics 99
- Literature and Literary Theory 134
- Forestry 37
- Religious studies 38
Countries citing papers authored by Nigel Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Smith. The network helps show where Nigel Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nigel Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 175 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 69 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 42 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 40 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 8 | A Collection of Ranter writings from the 17th century | 1983 | 22 |
| 9 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 12 | Literature and censorship | 1993 | 10 |
| 13 | 1988 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 19 | Radical voices, radical ways: Articulating and disseminating radicalism in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Britain | 2016 | 4 |
| 20 | 2007 | 4 |
About Nigel Smith
Nigel Smith is a scholar working on History, Plant Science, Political Science and International Relations, Forestry and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 92 papers that have together received 674 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (14 papers), Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory (11 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (10 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (9 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers), Cassava research and cyanide (5 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (4 papers) and Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (295 citations), Classics (99 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (134 citations), Forestry (37 citations) and Religious studies (38 citations). Nigel Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include André Luiz Atroch, Nicholas von Maltzahn, Elizabeth Tuttle, Tony Davies, Cedric C. Brown, Blair Worden, Martin Dzelzainis, Thomas N. Corns, Andrew Marvell and Victoria Kahn. Their work appears in journals such as Prose Studies, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, Women s Writing, The Modern Language Review and Journal of Historical Geography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.