Nigel Smith
Impact in
Papers in
- History 12
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 7
- Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory 3
- Scottish History and National Identity 3
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 4
- Co-authors
- André Luiz Atroch (1 shared paper)Andrew Marvell (1 shared paper)Thomas N. Corns (1 shared paper)Martin Dzelzainis (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Tuttle (1 shared paper)Roger Lejosne (1 shared paper)Blair Worden (1 shared paper)Victoria Kahn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Prose Studies (3 papers)Women s Writing (2 papers)The Modern Language Review (2 papers)Notes and Queries (1 paper)Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Nigel Smith
34 papers receiving 263 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- History 90
- Forestry 32
- Literature and Literary Theory 44
- Classics 13
- Religious studies 17
Countries citing papers authored by Nigel Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Smith. The network helps show where Nigel Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Nigel Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 8 | A Collection of Ranter writings from the 17th century | 1983 | 7 |
| 9 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 10 | Literature and censorship | 1993 | 4 |
| 11 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1986 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1985 | 2 | |
| 20 | Radical voices, radical ways: Articulating and disseminating radicalism in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Britain | 2016 | 2 |
About Nigel Smith
Nigel Smith is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Plant Science, Literature and Literary Theory and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (7 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory (3 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (2 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (90 citations), Forestry (32 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (44 citations), Classics (13 citations) and Religious studies (17 citations). Nigel Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include André Luiz Atroch, Andrew Marvell, Thomas N. Corns, Martin Dzelzainis, Elizabeth Tuttle, Roger Lejosne, Blair Worden, Victoria Kahn, Cedric C. Brown and David Armitage. Their work appears in journals such as Prose Studies, Women s Writing, The Modern Language Review, Notes and Queries and Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.