David Miskus
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 1%
- Hydrology and Drought Analysis
- Climate variability and models
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Flood Risk Assessment and Management
- Water Science and Technology top 2%
- Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Papers in
-
- Hydrology and Drought Analysis 4
- Climate variability and models 3
-
- Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Rich Tinker (3 shared papers)Mike Hayes (2 shared papers)Brad Rippey (2 shared papers)Scott Lewis Stephens (2 shared papers)Doug LeComte (2 shared papers)Mark D. Svoboda (2 shared papers)David Emory Stooksbury (2 shared papers)Richard R. Heim (2 shared papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
David Miskus
5 papers receiving 1.9k citations
David Miskus's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Global and Planetary Change 1.7k
- Water Science and Technology 496
- Atmospheric Science 353
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 367
- Environmental Engineering 185
Countries citing papers authored by David Miskus
This map shows the geographic impact of David Miskus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Miskus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Miskus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Miskus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Miskus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Miskus. The network helps show where David Miskus may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside David Miskus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | THE DROUGHT MONITOR Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 1048 |
| 2 | The Drought Monitor Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 745 |
| 3 | 2019 | 107 | |
| 4 | Fifth Annual Climate Assessment, 1993 | 1994 | 24 |
| 5 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 6 | Fourth Annual Climate Assessment, 1992 | 2017 | 0 |
About David Miskus
David Miskus is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Drought Analysis (4 papers), Climate variability and models (3 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (2 papers) and Climate change impacts on agriculture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (1.7k citations), Water Science and Technology (496 citations), Atmospheric Science (353 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (367 citations) and Environmental Engineering (185 citations). David Miskus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Rich Tinker, Mike Hayes, Brad Rippey, Scott Lewis Stephens, Doug LeComte, Mark D. Svoboda, David Emory Stooksbury, Richard R. Heim, Karin L. Gleason and James R. Angel. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society and Atmosphere.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.