David Milam

446 citations
14 papers · 225 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

David Milam

14 papers receiving 210 citations

Peers

David Milam
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Human-Computer Interaction 59
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 74
  • Computer Science Applications 20
  • Sociology and Political Science 97
  • Applied Psychology 8
Replace Henrik Schoenau‐Fog with:
Henrik Schoenau‐Fog Denmark
Noah Schaffer
Mikki H. Phan United States
Mirjam Palosaari Eladhari Sweden
Petri Lankoski Finland
A. Imran Nordin Malaysia
Mehmet Kosa United States
Viktor Wendel Germany
Borja Manero Spain
Elke Mattheiss Austria
David Milam relative to Henrik Schoenau‐Fog Denmark Henrik Schoenau‐Fog's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Henrik Schoenau‐Fog · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Milam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Milam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Milam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Milam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Milam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Milam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Milam. The network helps show where David Milam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside David Milam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Milam Line = papers co-authored together David Milam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2010114
2 201025
3 200722
4 201016
5
Assassin’s Creed: A Multi-Cultural Read
200815
6 201210
7 20038
8 20127
9
Proceedings of the First Workshop on Design Patterns in Games
20122
10 20122
11
Welcome from the organizers
20121
12
Visual motion in a railed shooter game: A designer study.
20131
13 20121
14
The Effect of Age, Gender, and Previous Gaming Experience on Customization activities within games
20101

About David Milam

David Milam is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 225 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (7 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (4 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (4 papers), Color perception and design (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (1 paper) and Gambling Behavior and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (59 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (74 citations), Computer Science Applications (20 citations), Sociology and Political Science (97 citations) and Applied Psychology (8 citations). David Milam has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Magy Seif El‐Nasr, Sang Yol Mah, Frank K. Agbogbo, Kevin S. Wenger, Simon Niedenthal, Katie Seaborn, Jacki Morie, Lyn Bartram, S. Sundar Kumar Iyer and Jonathan P. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Entertainment Computing and Foundations of Digital Games.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact