Noah Schaffer
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Usability and User Interface Design
-
- Educational Games and Gamification
Papers in
-
- Usability and User Interface Design 4
- Persona Design and Applications 3
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 1
-
- Educational Games and Gamification 5
- Co-authors
- Katherine Isbister (19 shared papers)
- Journals
- CRC Press eBooks (1 paper)CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (1 paper)Elsevier eBooks (16 papers)
In The Last Decade
Noah Schaffer
16 papers receiving 491 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Human-Computer Interaction 216
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 252
- Computer Science Applications 40
- Sociology and Political Science 278
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 66
Countries citing papers authored by Noah Schaffer
This map shows the geographic impact of Noah Schaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noah Schaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noah Schaffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noah Schaffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noah Schaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noah Schaffer. The network helps show where Noah Schaffer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Noah Schaffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Game Usability: Advancing the Player Experience | 2008 | 148 |
| 2 | 2008 | 137 | |
| 3 | Game usability : advice from the experts for advancing the player experience | 2008 | 114 |
| 4 | 2008 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 0 |
About Noah Schaffer
Noah Schaffer is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 19 papers that have together received 553 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Games and Gamification (5 papers), Digital Games and Media (4 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers), Persona Design and Applications (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (2 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (1 paper), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (216 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (252 citations), Computer Science Applications (40 citations), Sociology and Political Science (278 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (66 citations). Frequent co-authors include Katherine Isbister. Their work appears in journals such as CRC Press eBooks, CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) and Elsevier eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.