David Meyer

854 citations
7 papers · 674 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

David Meyer

7 papers receiving 636 citations

Peers

David Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Information Systems and Management 190
  • Physiology 305
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 91
  • Human-Computer Interaction 26
  • Marketing 11
Replace Pietro E. Michelucci with:
Pietro E. Michelucci United States
Luxi Shen China
Lizette De Wet South Africa
Jennifer Wernicke Germany
Jennifer A. Thornton United States
Mathieu Favier France
Jeff Haywood United Kingdom
Jody S. Piro United States
Hye Jeong Kim South Korea
David Meyer relative to Pietro E. Michelucci United States Pietro E. Michelucci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×12.7×
Pietro E. Michelucci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Meyer. The network helps show where David Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside David Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Meyer Line = papers co-authored together David Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2000322
2 2008250
3 200562
4 200631
5 20226
6
Paine, Webber, Jackson and Curtis, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith: Methods of Doing Business Held Patentable Because Implemented on a Computer, 5 Computer L.J. 101 (1984)
19842
7 20051

About David Meyer

David Meyer is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Physiology, Management of Technology and Innovation, Marketing and Law, having authored 7 papers that have together received 674 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Customer churn and segmentation (1 paper), Science Education and Pedagogy (1 paper), Intellectual Property and Patents (1 paper), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper), Digital Games and Media (1 paper) and Intellectual Property Law (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (190 citations), Physiology (305 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (91 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (26 citations) and Marketing (11 citations). David Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Astrid Dickinger and Mitra Arami. Their work appears in journals such as Chemistry Education Research and Practice, Science, European Journal of Information Systems, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact