David Matthews

1.4k citations
91 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

David Matthews

85 papers receiving 974 citations

Peers

David Matthews
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Condensed Matter Physics 417
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 203
  • Developmental Biology 19
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 34
  • Surgery 226
Replace Eiji Yanagisawa with:
Eiji Yanagisawa United States
James G. Hoehn United States
K Hayashi Japan
M. J. Makin Israel
JS Shah United Kingdom
Hiroki Kato Japan
Pierre Perrot France
Masanori Murakami Japan
�. Fischer Switzerland
Koji Shigematsu Japan
David Matthews relative to Eiji Yanagisawa United States Eiji Yanagisawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.5×
Eiji Yanagisawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Matthews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Matthews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Matthews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Matthews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Matthews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Matthews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Matthews. The network helps show where David Matthews may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Matthews, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Matthews Line = papers co-authored together David Matthews links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200395
2 199564
3 200357
4 199352
5 197048
6 201547
7 199243
8 201440
9 198735
10 198829
11 197929
12 195329
13 199127
14 195225
15 199825
16 199825
17 199324
18 198722
19 199422
20 199019

About David Matthews

David Matthews is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Surgery, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (37 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (11 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (11 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (8 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (8 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (7 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (7 papers) and Underwater Acoustics Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (417 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (203 citations), Developmental Biology (19 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (34 citations) and Surgery (226 citations). David Matthews has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include G.J. Russell, K. Taylor, K.-H. Müller, J. W. Cochrane, Joseph E. Imbriglia, Michael E. Beasley, Stanley B. Getz, Felmont F. Eaves, Chase Sova and Kevin L. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Physica C Superconductivity, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Journal of Crystal Growth, Sensors and British journal of surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact