David Lees
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Ethics in medical practice
Papers in
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 5
- Health Policy Implementation Science 2
-
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 3
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 3
- Co-authors
- Michelle Cleary (15 shared papers)Nicholas Procter (2 shared papers)Jan Sayers (7 shared papers)John R. Cutcliffe (1 shared paper)José Carlos Santos (1 shared paper)Luke Molloy (4 shared papers)Jonathan Mond (4 shared papers)Kim Walker (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
David Lees
27 papers receiving 264 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Clinical Psychology 123
- General Health Professions 90
- Health 21
- Research and Theory 2
- Social Psychology 51
Countries citing papers authored by David Lees
This map shows the geographic impact of David Lees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Lees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Lees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Lees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Lees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Lees. The network helps show where David Lees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Lees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 3 |
About David Lees
David Lees is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (123 citations), General Health Professions (90 citations), Health (21 citations), Research and Theory (2 citations) and Social Psychology (51 citations). David Lees has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Iran and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Michelle Cleary, Nicholas Procter, Jan Sayers, John R. Cutcliffe, José Carlos Santos, Luke Molloy, Jonathan Mond, Kim Walker, Srj Auckland and Richard Lakeman. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Issues in Mental Health Nursing, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Australian Journal of Rural Health and Journal of Transcultural Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.