Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

283.1k citations
9.2k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Sports injuries and prevention
    • Tendon Structure and Treatment
    • Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Surgery top 0.5%
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

Papers in

    • Sports injuries and prevention 791
    • Tendon Structure and Treatment 558
    • Foot and Ankle Surgery 479
  • Surgery 6.8k
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 3.4k
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 2.9k
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment 1.2k
    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 348

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

8.3k papers receiving 254.6k citations

Peers

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 64.8k
  • Surgery 201.3k
  • Rheumatology 20.3k
  • Urology 6.3k
  • Biomedical Engineering 37.1k
Replace Spine with:
Spine United States
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery United States
International Orthopaedics China
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders China
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Germany
Injury United Kingdom
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery United States
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons United States
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® United States
Osteoporosis International United States
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy relative to Spine United States Spine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Spine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy.

About Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

The 9.2k papers published in Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy in the last decades have received a total of 283.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (1.6k papers), Surgery (6.8k papers), Rheumatology (478 papers), Rehabilitation (131 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (853 papers) specifically the topics of Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (3.4k papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (2.9k papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (1.2k papers), Sports injuries and prevention (791 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (773 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (558 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (479 papers) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (348 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy are Freddie H. Fu, Håkan Alfredson, Andrew A. Amis, Jón Karlsson, Cornelis Niek van Dijk, Michael Tobias Hirschmann, Giuseppe Filardo, Stefano Zaffagnini, Maurilio Marcacci and Romain Seil.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact