David Križaj

5.1k citations
114 papers · 3.9k · h-index 37

Impact in

Papers in

David Križaj

112 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

David Križaj
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Sensory Systems 895
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Ophthalmology 551
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 311
  • Biochemistry 298
Replace Nanna MacAulay with:
Nanna MacAulay Denmark
Alejandro Caicedo United States
T. Renee Dawson United States
B. Ehinger Sweden
Atsushi Inanobe Japan
Nobuyuki Takei Japan
Inger Lauritzen France
Andrew R. Calver United Kingdom
Toni Schneider Germany
Reidun Torp Norway
David Križaj relative to Nanna MacAulay Denmark Nanna MacAulay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
Nanna MacAulay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Križaj

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Križaj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Križaj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Križaj more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Križaj

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Križaj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Križaj. The network helps show where David Križaj may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Križaj, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Križaj Line = papers co-authored together David Križaj links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999294
2 2015189
3 2011186
4 2013144
5 2002121
6 1998112
7 2016109
8 201499
9 200197
10 199993
11 199786
12 199884
13 199679
14 200276
15 200373
16 201771
17 200270
18 202058
19 202156
20 201755

About David Križaj

David Križaj is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Ophthalmology and Physiology, having authored 114 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (45 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (33 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (30 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (29 papers), Connexins and lens biology (25 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (15 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (11 papers) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (895 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Ophthalmology (551 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (311 citations) and Biochemistry (298 citations). David Križaj has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include David R. Copenhagen, Oleg Yarishkin, Paul Witkovsky, Mónika Lakk, Daniel A. Ryskamp, Andrew Jo, Tam T. T. Phuong, Péter Barabás, Nanna MacAulay and Sarah N. Redmon. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Neuroscience, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact