David Joyce

1.0k citations
6 papers · 494 · 1 hit paper · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Journal of Algebra (2 papers)Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra (1 paper)Discrete Mathematics (1 paper)Studies in Psychology Estudios de Psicología (1 paper)Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) (1 paper)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

David Joyce

6 papers receiving 449 citations

David Joyce's Hit Papers

A classifying invariant of knots, the knot quandle 1982 · 453 citations
4530+14+29Years since publication100200300400

Peers

David Joyce
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Geometry and Topology 454
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 165
  • Mathematical Physics 292
  • Algebra and Number Theory 70
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 151
Replace Zlil Sela with:
Zlil Sela Israel
Ralph Strebel Germany
N. S. Romanovskiĭ Russia
Jon McCammond United States
Luis Paris France
Boris Moishezon Israel
Patrick M. Gilmer United States
Philip Wagreich United States
Pierre‐Emmanuel Caprace Belgium
G. A. Swarup India
David Joyce relative to Zlil Sela Israel Zlil Sela's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Zlil Sela · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Joyce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Joyce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Joyce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Joyce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Joyce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Joyce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Joyce. The network helps show where David Joyce may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
A classifying invariant of knots, the knot quandle
Hit paper breakdown →
1982453
2 198220
3
An Algebraic Approach to Symmetry With Applications to Knot Theory
197910
4 19847
5 19862
6 20062

About David Joyce

David Joyce is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Signal Processing, having authored 6 papers that have together received 494 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (2 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (1 paper), Commutative Algebra and Its Applications (1 paper), Advanced Topics in Algebra (1 paper), Data Management and Algorithms (1 paper), History and Theory of Mathematics (1 paper), Advanced Algebra and Logic (1 paper) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (454 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (165 citations), Mathematical Physics (292 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (70 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (151 citations). David Joyce has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebra, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Discrete Mathematics, Studies in Psychology Estudios de Psicología and Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact