David John Baker

28 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

David John Baker
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • History and Philosophy of Science 132
  • Classics 61
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 129
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 65
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 52
Replace Peter D. Pešić with:
Peter D. Pešić United States
Roshdi Rashed France
Samuel Sambursky Israel
Olival Freire Brazil
Jed Z. Buchwald United States
Michael M. J. Morris United Kingdom
Bernard R. Goldstein United States
Michael A. Hoskin United Kingdom
Fabio Acerbi France
Brian Gee United Kingdom
David John Baker relative to Peter D. Pešić United States Peter D. Pešić's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.7×
Peter D. Pešić · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David John Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David John Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David John Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David John Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David John Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David John Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David John Baker. The network helps show where David John Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside David John Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David John Baker Line = papers co-authored together David John Baker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200961
2 200958
3 201052
4 200637
5 199833
6 201420
7 202018
8 200916
9 200515
10 199214
11 201112
12 201611
13 201310
14 201310
15 20209
16
Knossos : Unearthing a Legend
19967
17 20206
18 19975
19 20055
20 20115

About David John Baker

David John Baker is a scholar working on Classics, History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and History, having authored 36 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance Literature and Culture (12 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (8 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (7 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (5 papers), Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (3 papers) and Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (132 citations), Classics (61 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (129 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (65 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (52 citations). David John Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Hans Halvorson, Christopher Ivic, Andrew Hadfield, Willy Maley, Karl‐Otto Apel, David Seawright and Patrick Gerard Cheney. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Shakespeare Quarterly and Renaissance Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact