David Jeffrey

37 papers receiving 579 citations

Peers

David Jeffrey
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Family Practice 24
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 188
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 226
  • General Health Professions 175
  • Health Informatics 7
Replace Abigail Ford Winkel with:
Abigail Ford Winkel United States
Liesbeth M. van Vliet Netherlands
Jos V. M. Welie United States
Sarah L. Clever United States
Andrew Moscrop United Kingdom
William Salazar United States
Barry Egener United States
Claudia Goss Italy
Sophie Lelorain France
Annie Cushing United Kingdom
David Jeffrey relative to Abigail Ford Winkel United States Abigail Ford Winkel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Abigail Ford Winkel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Jeffrey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Jeffrey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Jeffrey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Jeffrey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Jeffrey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Jeffrey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Jeffrey. The network helps show where David Jeffrey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside David Jeffrey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Jeffrey Line = papers co-authored together David Jeffrey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016172
2 202056
3 201638
4 200538
5 200832
6 200531
7 199429
8 201629
9 201628
10 200523
11
DOMICILIARY PALLIATIVE CARE: A guide for the primary care team
199520
12 199517
13 200217
14 201916
15 201713
16 200411
17 20169
18 20037
19 20205
20 20204

About David Jeffrey

David Jeffrey is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Family Practice, having authored 44 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Empathy and Medical Education (19 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (16 papers), Ethics in medical practice (15 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (7 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (6 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (6 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (24 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (188 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (226 citations), General Health Professions (175 citations) and Health Informatics (7 citations). David Jeffrey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include R. S. Downie, Lillian G. Dawes, Rob George, Ilora Finlay, Rachel McCoubrie, Chad M. Paton and C. Reid. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, Journal of Medical Ethics and The Lancet Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact