David J. Schultz

54 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

David J. Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Internal Medicine 109
  • Biochemistry 151
  • Biochemistry 66
  • Cancer Research 154
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 74
Replace Thomas B. Elliott with:
Thomas B. Elliott United States
Alice Maria Costa Martins Brazil
Valérie Gausson France
Rajinder Singh Malaysia
Mi Yeon Lee South Korea
Kim Brint Pedersen United States
Abha Khandelwal United States
James D. Ogle United States
H. D. Becker Germany
David J. Schultz relative to Thomas B. Elliott United States Thomas B. Elliott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×25.2×
Thomas B. Elliott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David J. Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David J. Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David J. Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. Schultz. The network helps show where David J. Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David J. Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David J. Schultz Line = papers co-authored together David J. Schultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009163
2 2004140
3 1994128
4 2021111
5 2012105
6
Substance-abusing child welfare parents: treatment and child placement outcomes.
200189
7 199664
8 200056
9 199955
10 201049
11 201838
12 200625
13 200223
14 201621
15 201220
16 201719
17 201218
18 201617
19 201117
20 201916

About David J. Schultz

David J. Schultz is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Plant Science, Oncology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ginkgo biloba and Cashew Applications (6 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (6 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers), Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (5 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (4 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (4 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (3 papers) and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (109 citations), Biochemistry (151 citations), Biochemistry (66 citations), Cancer Research (154 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (74 citations). David J. Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include John B. Ohlrogge, Mi Chung Suh, Diana Cox-Foster, Ralph O. Mumma, June I. Medford, Richard Craig, David W. Powell, William L. Dean, Timothy D. Cummins and Jeyaprakash Jeyabalan. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Veterinary Journal, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Microbiology, Journal of Wildlife Diseases and Australian Journal of Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact