David Haws

24 papers receiving 224 citations

Peers

David Haws
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 18
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 13
  • Computational Mathematics 2
  • Signal Processing 35
  • Algebra and Number Theory 13
Replace John W. Williams with:
John W. Williams United States
David Eppstein Chile
Kan Hu China
Nobuji Saito Japan
Jukka Teuhola Finland
Petr Kolman Czechia
Naveen Sivadasan India
John Roscoe Clark United States
Tomio Hirata Japan
David Haws relative to John W. Williams United States John W. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
John W. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Haws

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Haws's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Haws with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Haws more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Haws

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Haws. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Haws. The network helps show where David Haws may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Haws, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Haws Line = papers co-authored together David Haws links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201348
2 200426
3 201121
4 201517
5 201116
6 201514
7 201512
8 201111
9 201311
10 200510
11 20199
12 20218
13 20127
14 20217
15 20135
16 20094
17 20123
18 20123
19 20223
20 20163

About David Haws

David Haws is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 27 papers that have together received 245 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech Recognition and Synthesis (8 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (4 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (4 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (4 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers), Commutative Algebra and Its Applications (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (18 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (13 citations), Computational Mathematics (2 citations), Signal Processing (35 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (13 citations). David Haws has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ruriko Yoshida, Sen-ching S. Cheung, Milan Studený, Peter Huggins, Jesús A. De Loera, Raymond Hemmecke, Irina Rish, James Cussens, Dan He and Xiaodong Cui. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, BMC Bioinformatics, Discrete Optimization, Discrete & Computational Geometry and Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact