Stephen Koss

1.0k citations
31 papers · 632 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Koss

25 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

Stephen Koss
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • History 138
  • Political Science and International Relations 237
  • Sociology and Political Science 257
  • Anthropology 45
  • Cultural Studies 36
Replace Robert F. Durden with:
Robert F. Durden United States
Charles S. Blackton United States
Thomas Nipperdey Germany
Robert E. Shalhope United States
Norman A. Graebner United States
Sandra Stanley Holton Australia
Douglas L. Wheeler United States
Richard L. Watson United States
Lars Schoultz United States
Piero Gleijeses United States
Stephen Koss relative to Robert F. Durden United States Robert F. Durden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Robert F. Durden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Koss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Koss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Koss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Koss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Koss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Koss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Koss. The network helps show where Stephen Koss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Koss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Koss Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Koss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970117
2 1978101
3 198594
4 199785
5 196938
6 197722
7 197222
8 197521
9 197721
10 197019
11 197319
12 197017
13 196911
14 198310
15 19747
16
The Pro-Boers : the anatomy of an antiwar movement
19735
17 19715
18 20024
19 19844
20 19743

About Stephen Koss

Stephen Koss is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Anthropology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 632 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Australian History and Society (4 papers), World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers) and Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (138 citations), Political Science and International Relations (237 citations), Sociology and Political Science (257 citations), Anthropology (45 citations) and Cultural Studies (36 citations). Stephen Koss has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Angus Calder, Alfred F. Havighurst, John C. Richmond, Paul Johnson, David Hamer, Mary Peter Mack, Joel H. Wiener, Henry R. Winkler, Kevin Patrick and Mary Jo Deering. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Political Science Quarterly, The Journal of Modern History, The English Historical Review and The American Journal of Sports Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact