David Hager

28 papers receiving 816 citations

Peers

David Hager
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Transplantation 106
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 137
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 458
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 59
  • Family Practice 14
Replace James B. McClurken with:
James B. McClurken United States
Marjolijn van Buren Netherlands
Amanda R. Vest United States
Mark L. McBride United States
Macaulay Onuigbo United States
Anthony Steimle United States
Dmitry Abramov United States
Akhil Parashar United States
Jason Swindle United States
Nairne Scott‐Douglas Canada
David Hager relative to James B. McClurken United States James B. McClurken's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
James B. McClurken · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Hager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Hager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Hager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hager. The network helps show where David Hager may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Hager, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Hager Line = papers co-authored together David Hager links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982145
2 2002143
3 2010118
4 199471
5 201460
6 200854
7 200438
8 201438
9 199633
10 198331
11 198127
12 201717
13 200315
14 201610
15 20189
16 20208
17 20188
18 20176
19 20176
20 20175

About David Hager

David Hager is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Transplantation, Emergency Medical Services and General Health Professions, having authored 30 papers that have together received 865 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (10 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (7 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (5 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (4 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers) and Medication Adherence and Compliance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (106 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (137 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (458 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (59 citations) and Family Practice (14 citations). David Hager has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Rose Anne Kenny, Rebecca S. Boxer, Alison Kleppinger, Stacey J. Wieczorek, Alan H.B. Wu, T G Rosano, Padma Krishnaswamy, Nancy Gardetto, Robert H. Christenson and Stephen S. Gottlieb. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Transplantation, CHEST Journal and New England Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact