David Good

32 papers receiving 1.2k citations

David Good's Hit Papers

Solubility Advantage of Pharmaceutical Cocrystals 2009 · 731 citations
7310+5+11Years since publication200400600

Peers

David Good
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 673
  • Pharmaceutical Science 182
  • Materials Chemistry 737
  • Dermatology 87
  • Inorganic Chemistry 116
Replace Jan Čejka with:
Jan Čejka Czechia
Mikio Yagi Japan
Jordi Teixidó Spain
Xiaoming Luo China
Jo Klaveness Norway
Kunio Okamoto Japan
Walter Wolf United States
Thierry Terme France
David W. Henry United States
Susan E. Hill United States
David Good relative to Jan Čejka Czechia Jan Čejka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.5×
Jan Čejka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Good. The network helps show where David Good may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Good Line = papers co-authored together David Good links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Solubility Advantage of Pharmaceutical Cocrystals
Hit paper breakdown →
2009731
2 2007112
3 201166
4 201836
5 200931
6 201028
7 201522
8 201617
9 201817
10 201715
11 200815
12 201915
13 201713
14 201713
15 200810
16 20159
17 20118
18 20228
19 20158
20 20148

About David Good

David Good is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Hematology, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Genetics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (13 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (5 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (5 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (4 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (4 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (4 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (4 papers) and Crystallography and molecular interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (673 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (182 citations), Materials Chemistry (737 citations), Dermatology (87 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (116 citations). David Good has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Naír Rodríguez‐Hornedo, Adivaraha Jayasankar, Randy D. Gascoyne, Michael J. Rauh, John R. Crison, John M. Bennett, Jeffrey A. Silverman, Jane L. Liesveld, Daniel H. Ryan and Fazlur Rahman. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Molecular Pharmaceutics, Leukemia Research, Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact